By combining advantageous examples of cutting processing and mold forming, the mutual disadvantages can be complemented, resulting in effective performance!
Shapes that are disadvantageous for cutting processes, such as thin materials and convex shapes, present challenges such as "the need for innovative jigs to process the outer peripheral shape" and "a large amount of material removal from the product."
On the other hand, shapes that are advantageous for mold processing, such as thin materials and convex shapes, offer various benefits, including fewer constraints on cutting parts and outer peripheral shapes for removal processing of product sections and gates.
**Benefits of shapes that are advantageous for mold processing:**
- Fewer cutting parts for removal processing of product sections and gates
- Ability to digitize gate proposals along with product data, allowing simultaneous processing with product sections
- Fewer constraints on outer peripheral shapes (basically, steps are a load)
- No need for special jigs during processing (easy clamping of the workpiece)
*For more details, please refer to the related link page or feel free to contact us.*
![[Case Study of Simple Mold Introduction] Shapes Suitable for 3CD (Flexible Response)](https://image.mono.ipros.com/public/product/image/ae0/2000576091/IPROS15102886972088800700.png?w=280&h=280)
